Shirley's challenge

Forums Gallery Shirley's challenge

This topic contains 18 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Eric 1 month, 3 weeks ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #4014
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    Awhile ago, Peter Shirley issued a little challenge:

    So eventually I had to give it a try with bella:

    #4016
    Philip
    Philip

    Wow! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Philip

    #4026
    Avatar
    Thomas An.

    Epic !

    #4054
    Eric
    Eric

    Sorry JD, I don’t think that looks much like the photo, nor much different from any other render engines output. The effect of glass glowing, due to surface imperfections or volume impurities, is not present.

    #4055
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    I agree it is not a good match, but the test was more about this being quite a difficult lighting scenario, given that about all we see is from light refracted back out of the crystals.

    #4057
    Avatar
    Thomas An.

    I don’t agree with Eric. This was a tongue-in-cheek poorly defined challenge. It’s an iPhone photo from a random location and Shirley never told us what else was in the room contributing to the reflections. A proper challenge would have all variables controlled in a well defined environment. So, given how informal this was, Bella is doing an impressive job with dispersion and refraction.

    #4059
    Eric
    Eric

    I want an ‘sss’ type thingy which mimics glass glow, normal sss can’t do it. Glass glow matters!

    #4074
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    Been using the second render for a long-term stability test, it has now been stopped and resumed many times, and rendered for I don’t know how long (on the order of hundreds of hours, on a 14-core xeon), to level 98:

    #4081
    Avatar
    Thomas An.

    Impressive numbers but for the wrong reasons ๐Ÿ™‚ This is one case where extra time didn’t matter. All essential light elements/phenomena were present in the first image. In which case a simple denoise would have sufficed.

    I would even consider the bold move of hard limiting all renders to less than 10hr. The Bella engine should not allow you to enter higher times. If the engine can’t do something in a max of 10hr just do something else.

    #4082
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    Hmm, not sure about that idea, what about when I want to render something 10k x 10k pixels?

    #4083
    Avatar
    Thomas An.

    Hmm, not sure about that idea, what about when I want to render something 10k x 10k pixels?

    LoL, Confucius says “you should rid yourself of such wants to be free of pain”. If someone wanted big prints like that they’d consider a larger render farm to get to higher render level within the time frame.

    The premise is that very few people on the planet (maybe five ?) today are actually willing to tie up resources for over 10hr on a single image. Back in the day it was curiosity. Today, not so much unless the engine is also solving the time-space-continuum.

    #4084
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    Probably both true, but I still don’t see a reason for artificially limiting it. An argument can be made for making the default render time limit to be 10 hours or such, but beyond that you will add complexity (logic in resume/merge/etc) for no (to my thinking) good reason.

    #4090
    Eric
    Eric

    I think it would render a lot quicker with phong shading / round spheres, even small fillets might speed it up, there would be more geo but also more ray ‘cohesion’ around corners.. I’m just guessing.

    #4091
    Jeremy Hill
    Jeremy Hill

    It did not take that long to be acceptable, I was mainly just running it as an extreme test, to ensure that there is nowhere in the code that starts misbehaving once you get into dealing with very large numbers.

    As for whether it would render faster with another shading model or other geometry, that may be possible, but I suppose a similar effect could be produced by just restricting the number of bounces, too.

    #4094
    Eric
    Eric

    I think the way to get glass to glow, is for a tiny piece of light to be emitted at the point of every internal bounce, such a tiny amount but it builds up, that might contradict contemporary science but they are always revising shit, so my hunch is that it’s an entirely plausible cause of ‘glass glow’.

    Einstein was a fraud, just look at his grin.

    You can put sss into just the LAYER, and turn on phong shading.. maybe works. SSS with pos assymetry I guess.

    EDIT

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.